Saturday, September 30, 2006

Megastar’s latest flick – a mega disappointment for his US fans.

Telugu people are big movie fans, and they go crazy when it comes to Megastar Chiranjeevi’s movies. This is true also of Telugus in the US, who were thrilled to see his latest movie, Stalin released in different US cities on the same day as in Andhra.

I went to see Stalin last Sunday (four days after it’s release). All Chiru fans were in festive mood – screaming and whistling as the title started rolling. This continued until the first song, but it became increasingly difficult to maintain the same level of excitement. The audience mood turns somber as Chiru gets into the serious business of helping handicapped women to set the stage for his grand scheme: “If you get help, you promise to help three others”.

Stalin, a son of communist leader, is a socially conscious person with impatient zeal to change the society. In the process of helping others, he realizes that it is not possible for him alone to save the world (in spite of his larger than life image and mighty martial powers of Indra + Tagore combined). For example, Stalin lends his hand to a brilliant handicapped (without two hands) student to write her college final exams. Unfortinately, she kills herself the next day due to her failure to find help to write her exams, and Stalin was busy helping a blind women do her Chemistry practicals. While helping another person, he launches the new scheme to multiply his efforts. The scheme starts sluggishly in the beginning, but takes off later like a wildfire. A 10-year girl saves the Chief Minister and hundred others from a jihadist. At one end of this multi-stranded chain, a rikshaw-puller-turned auto-driver helps Stalin to escape from villains. With this, the chain completes one full circle.

As if this larger than life image is not good enough for Chiranjeevi, there is a Kargil war track where Stalin defeats the enemy single-handedly, reclaims the mountain peak and furls the national flag. This track has little connection with the main plot, and is a big waste of footage, time and money.

Of course, there is a comedy track with two parts. Both are centered on the same (but also opposite) region of anatomy. In the first part, Chiranjeevi is to explain why his little nephew, Harbhajan Singh is called a chitti eluka by the heroine. Chiru is prevented from verbalizing his answer due to modesty, but gestures it nicely that audience get a chucke. But the little girl, whom the heroine escorts to the bathroom, does not feel shy to verbalize. She reveals to Chiru that both herself and the heroine are wearing the same color thing. The heroine feels exposed to the hero by this episode, and the song sequences follow.

The duets are beautifully picturized, but it is difficult to detect the right chemistry between the pair. See the heroine declares she is only 19, and the hero does not look like he is below 40s (or 50s). I saw pitru-vaatsalyam when Chiru kissed the heroine. By the way, Trisha looks ravishingly charming. Her youthfulness is no anyway diminished by the mismatched pairing. But nobody cares about the heroine. She is sidelined in almost all the scenes except the songs. Even the villains do not think she is worth going after. Instead, they take the little Harbhajan away in revenge.

The movie ends after Sunil lectures the expert cardio-surgeons on how Chiru’s heart is connected to the 10 crore other hearts and such an adored heart cannot be allowed to stop by a tiny bullet, however close it is to the heart.

How is the movie related to the real Stalin? In the west (and even in Russia), Stalin is known as a brutal dictator. He is famous (rather infamous) for three things: (1) Russian industrial revolution, five year plans forced through labor camps and Gulags, (2) Purges: elimination of his opponents in the communist party, and (3) collectivization of farming, which caused hunger and famine, and liquidated a class of farmers called kulaks. But that is not the Stalin people in India know. Our beloved first prime minister, Nehru portrayed Stalin as a Saint of the Soviet Union. We seem to believe that lie even now. Murugadoss and Chirajeevi seem to support this big lie about Stalin.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Pesticide residues in Coke and Pepsi - who is telling the truth?

The Center for Science and Environment (CSE) reported recently that their laboratory tests show high levels of pesticides in Coke and Pepsi drinks.

But the soft drink manufactures claim that the “drinks are completely safe” and “The soft drinks manufactured in India comply with stringent international norms and all applicable national regulations."

The CSE director, Sunita Narain declares, “This is a grave public health scandal”.

The Left Front Government in Kerala, (the most literate state in India), without running their own tests or without waiting for test results from Central Government Laboratories, declare a ban on production and sales of Coke and Pepsi in the state, just to advertise their anti-multinational and anti-American credentials. By the way, it is an illegal act to ban production based on such unproven violations.

However, the central Health Minister, Dr. Ramadoss says that on-going tests on these drinks from different parts of the country show that the levels of pesticides in these drinks are not at harmful levels.

Ironically, the left Government of Bengali Babus in West Bengal do not follow the Kerala’s lead. In fact the LF chairman Biman Bose concurs with Mr. Ramadoss and says, ‘‘Whatever is found in normal drinking water is there in Coke and Pepsi. No more, no less.’’

Who is telling the truth?

Sunita Narain or Dr. Ramadoss? Kerala Left or West Bengal Left?

Whom do you believe? What should a consumer do?

To get answers to these questions, I did a small investigation. I went to the CSE website (www.cseindia.org) and read their press releases on this topic. (The CSE looks like a credible organization with a executive board consisting of mostly retired professionals. They appear to be pro-environment activists.)

The first stated result of the CSE report on Coke and Pepsi is that these contain unsafe levels of Heptaclor, a pesticide. According to Govt.’s response, this pesticide is banned in India in 1996. Heptaclor is not produced or distrubuted in the country for the past 10 years. So how does it get into these soft drinks? Are the Pepsi and Coke companies illegally producing it and mixing in the drinks? Not so. CSE does not accuse the soft drink companies of such illegal acts. In its point-to-point rebuttal to the Govt, response, CSE says that the residues of the Heptaclor remain in our soil and environment for 20 years and passed into water and food supplies.

By implication, the source of the “unsafe” levels of Heptaclor found in soft drinks is ground water.

I wrote to the CSE and received a prompt response from Shachi Chaturvedi of CSE Media Resource Centre, confirming my conclusions.

Now let us look at these facts:

Coke and Pepsi produce and distribute 500 million (50 crore) bottles of the soft drinks in India per year. (Contract this with 2.5 billions (250 crores) of soft drinks consumed by the US consumers per week). A simple arithmetic calculation shows that an Indian consumes ½ bottle of Coke / Pepsi on average per year. On the other hand, every Indian consumes several bottles of water with the same “unsafe” levels of Heptaclor per day.

If you are rational, you can see that the health effects of soft drink consumption are so minor that it is not worth this kind of public argument. Drinking water is causing much more damage to the health of citizens.

Clearly the CSE is misguided in raising media frenzy about this issue and the Kerala Left Govt. is dead wrong in banning Coke and Pepsi.

Govinda RB.
September 17, 2006